Innasense or lack thereof

Monday, January 30, 2006

A long way to Aristotle

A tenth-century Chinese Encyclopedia gives the following classification of the world's animals:

1. Those belonging to the Emperor
2. Embalmed
3. Tame
4. Suckling Pigs
5. Sirens
6. Fabulous
7. Stray Dogs
8. Included in the Present Classification
9. Frenzied
10. Innumerable
11. Drawn with a Very Fine Camel Brush
12. Et Cetera
13. Having Just Broken the Water Pitcher
14. That from a Long Way Off Look Like Flies

Studying to O-Zone

"Music is extremely useful, as I have come to realize. Especially when you have to get things done in my house, where my bedroom doubles as my father's office, and my father talks to himself while he works." This is what I thought before I realized that my father was actually speaking to me, and I've been ignoring him for five minutes.

A tribute to Chekhov

Chekhov was a genius. Perhaps I'm biased, since I just spent weeks cramming for the one-question True-and-False exam at the end of my Chekhov class, but you will agree when you find out that he came up with Catch 22 half a century before Joseph Heller did. In one of Chekhov's early stories, 'Cвадьба'--not to be confused with 'Женитьба'--a man wants a doctor's certificate confirming that he is insane, in order to avoid marrying a certain girl, but the doctor replies that he can certify the man's insanity only when he actually wants to get married. I was impressed.

Since this is my first blog entry (the test entry doesn't count) I suppose I should explain why I'm keeping a blog at all. But since I'm in a Chekhovian mood, you'll have to bear with me as I revert back to the nineteenth century in a 2am fit of silliness. You should keep in mind that I generally prefer googletalk to the telegraph, and K* isn't really a gentleman. At least not in the way Chekhov would have used the word.

I was once "acquainted" with a certain gentleman K*. It so happened that one day I found myslef in the urban metropolis of M*, while the gentleman of my "acquaintance" remained in another urban metropolis on the opposite side of the lake. One evening, unable to express the depth and intensity of my affection for said gentleman over the telegraph, and groping for a concise way to uncover the feelings in my soul, I told him that he was my blog. (They were charging me by the letter after all, and "my love" has most certainly been overused by dull and unimaginative letter-writers) Struck by my words, he said it was the nicest thing anyone had ever said to him. But he was being sarcastic.

And so I started thinking--perhaps it really is unnatural to force the role of both boyfriend and blog onto one person, perhaps I should keep K* as my boyfriend, and leave the role of blog to, well, this blog.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

TECT

-KTO TAM?
-NHHA